Nowy, I don't know why and don;t know what you want to reach, but writing about historial accurate in topic where someone want to know about tactics to playing against AI is nonsense.
It was not nonsense. If you could read again that thread about tactics against AI, you can find these historical aspects which are normal for historical based game. You also did it yourself few times in that topic.
JM also asked what people prefer in this game. Then it could not be nonsense when someone answered that likes historical methods and want to play in such way in the game which theoretically was historically based.
Most of players want to have fun and only have fun. You wrote few posts with your opinion about historical nations, tactics, game defects, units. Nice, but nothing ad rem. In my opinion history is important, and historical accurate is something good, but when someone want to know about tactics in game, then we should writing about it because it is forum about C1.
Yes, people want to have fun and I have fun with playing in little bit more historically accurate tactics.
I also cast my remarks about many things in these games.
These could be more fun to play when they could included more historically accurate things.
I always wrote ad rem, but I usually emphasize historical aspects which are clearly clou in historically based games.
In my opinion your problem with low activity of members is wrong expectations.
It is not my problem. Low activity was discernible, then I found it as little bit strange thing.
I have not any wrong expectation. People can do whatever they whant to do, but it could be strange when 7,000 members had not something more to say about these fine games.
Quote ( Cichor)
When I looking at your posts I imagine your vision of forum (maybe it is only my imagination): people discuss about history, historical accurate, weakness of games and "what GSC must change".
No, it is not my vision of forum.
If people like these games they can talk about these games what they really want.
I prefer historical accuracy, however I am not historical purist.
Nevertheless these aspects are very interesting and therefore I wrote about history which could and should be base for these games.
I cast many weakness as well as some strong things of this games.
Only lovely words about games or only technical support could be bore.
Then I prefer cast some questions, suggestions, wishes and remarks. It could be more interesting and as I can see it is readable.
Did not say "what GSC must change" only express my feelings that they or another good team modders could do something more for these old games. These games and their funs deserve it.